Orthodontic Retainers
Penang International Dental College, Malaysia
Abstract
One of the most challenging phase for an orthodontist is to retain the corrections achieved during the course of orthodontic treatment. Retainers are passive orthodontic appliances that help in maintaining and stabilizing the position of teeth long enough to permit reorganization of supporting structures after the active phase of orthodontic therapy. This article provides a comprehensive review about the various types of orthodontic retainers available today.
Keywords: Orthodontic retainers, Removable retainers, Bonded retainers, Essix retainers.
INTRODUCTION
Retention is the phase of orthodontic treatment which maintains the teeth in their orthodontically corrected positions following the cessation of active orthodontic tooth movement. If teeth are not maintained in its new position it tends to “relapse”. The major causes of relapse after orthodontic treatment include the • Elasticity of gingival fibers • Cheek/lip/tongue pressures, • Jaw growth. • Gingival fibers and soft tissue pressures are especially potent in the first few months after treatment ends, before PDL reorganization has been completed. • Unfavourable growth is the major contributor to changes in occlusal relationships1. Orthodontic retainers resist the tendency of teeth to return to their pre-treatment positions under the influence of periodontal, occlusal and soft tissue forces, and continuing dentofacial growth.
HISTORY
Knierim2 in the year 1973 reported the use of direct bonding fixed retainers. In 1977, Zachrisson stated the importance of using multistranded wires for constructing the bonded retainers. Later in 1982, Artun and Zachrisson3 introduced a clinical technique of bonding retainer from canine to canine. Soon after Zachrison stressed the importance of using multistranded wires for bonding due to its increased mechanical retention and flexibility4,5,6.
FACTORS WHICH MAY MODIFY THE RETENTION PROTOCOL
- Corrected rotations of anterior teeth7.
- Lower incisor alignment8.
- Changes in the antero-posterior lower incisor position9.
- Correction of deep overbite9.
- Patients with a history of periodontal disease or root resorption9.
- Correction of anterior open bites9.
- Growth modification treatment10.
- Correction of posterior and anterior crossbites14.
- Adult Patients11.
- Spaced dentitions12.
GRABERS CRITERIA FOR IDEAL RETAINER
- Should retain all teeth that have been moved into desired positions.
- Should permit normal functional forces to act freely on the dentition.
- Should be selfâ€cleansing.
- Should permit oral hygiene maintenance.
- Should be strong enough to bear the rigors of dayâ€toâ€day usage.
REMOVABLE RETAINERS
Removable retainers are the most common retainers because they are patient friendly and can be removed and reinserted by the patient.
1.Hawley’s Retainer
This retainer was designed in 1920 by Charles Hawley. It is by far the most frequently used retainer till date. It Consists of claps on molars and a short labial bow extending from canine to canine having adjustment loops13.
2.Begg’s retainer
Consists of a labial wire that extends till the last erupted molar and curves around it to get embeded in acrylic that spans the palate. Advantage: There is no cross over wire that extends between the canine and premolar thereby eliminating the risk of space opening14.
3.Clip – on retainer / spring aligner
This appliance is made of a wire frame work that runs labially over the incisors and then passes b/w the canine and premolar and is reserved to lie over the lingual surface. Both the labial as well as lingual segments are embedded in a strip of clear acrylic. It brings about corrections of rotations commonly seen in lower anterior region15.
4.Wrap around retainer
It is a type of spring aligner. It consists of wire that passes along the labial as well as lingual surfaces of all erupted teeth which is embedded in a strip of acrylic. It helps in stabilizing a periodontally weak dentition15.
5.Kesling tooth positioner
It is made of thermoplastic rubber like material that spans the inter – occlusal space and covers the clinical crowns of the upper and lower teeth and a small portion of the gingiva. It needs no activation at regular intervals and is durable17.
Drawbacks: - difficulty in speech - risk of TMJ problems.
6.Invisible retainers
Fully cover the clinical crowns and a part of the gingival tissue. It is made of ultra thin transparent thermoplastic sheets using a Biostar machine. It is esthetic and highly popular due to its invisible form18.
7.Crozat retainer
A 4-4 Crozat appliance has cribs on the first bicuspids, recurved double lapping lingual finger springs and a labial bow. Advantages are firm retention, labiolingual control of anterior teeth, flexible, maintenance of adequate oral hygiene, because it is removable and esthetic. The major disadvantages of the appliance are: It is cost effective and it is breakable19 .
8.Vander linden retainer
The Vander linden retainer is constructed to offer complete control over the maxillary anterior teeth, with firm fixation provided by clasps on the canines. This retainer does not usually interfere with the occlusion20.
9.Kansals Retainer
It is a removable tooth borne orthodontic retainer which has acrylic and wire components. The wire components include modified labial bow,Kansals bow and pin head clasps. The main advantage of this retainer is that it is less bulky, low food accumulation and easy to clean21.
10.Osamu Invisible Retainer
It is a retainer made up of thin thermoplastic sheets.They extend from the clinical crowns of the teeth to the part of the adjacent gingiva22.
ADVANTAGES OF REMOVABLE APPLIANCE
- It is removable
- Effective for simple malocclusions
- Smaller anchorage requirement
- Uncompromised oral hygiene
- Short chair side time
- Ease of adjustment.
- Less professional training for management.
DISADVANTAGES OF REMOVABLE APPLIANCES
- Dependant on patient compliance
- Unable to perform complex malocclusion
- Difficulty in speech
- Prone to breakage and loss
FIXED RETAINERS
Fixed retainers are a type of invisible retainers which are either banded or bonded to the lingual surface of the teeth,hence it is not visible to the naked eye.It is indicated where prolonged retention is required and involves miminal or no patient cooperation.They are fixed to the teeth and hence cannot be removed by the patient.
1.Band and spur retainers
It is indicated where a single tooth has been orthodontically treated for rotation correction or labiolingual displacement. The tooth that has been moved banded and spurs are soldered onto the bands so as to overlap the adjacent teeth.
2.Banded canine to canine retainer
It is commonly used in lower anterior region.Canines are banded and a thick wire is contoured over the lingual aspects and soldered to canine bands.
3.Bonded lingual retainers
They are bonded on lingual aspects following anterior curvature. The ends are curved over the canines where it is bonded [23].
ADVANTAGES OF FIXED RETAINER
- Reduced need for patient co-operation
- Can be used when conventional retainers cannot provide same degree of stability.
- Bonded retainers are more esthetics
- No tissue irritation unlike what may been seen in tissue bearing areas of Hawley’s retainer
- Can be used for permanent and semi permanent retention.
- Do not affect speech.
DISADVANTAGES OF FIXED RETAINERS
- More cumbersome to insert
- Increased chair side time
- More expensive
- Loss of healthy tooth material
- Tend to discolour
CONCLUSION
Retention forms an integral part of orthodontic treatment. Compared to removable retainers,fixed retainers have shown to have better treatment stability. However more clinical trials have to be carried out to prove the efficiency of both removable and fixed retainers.
REFERENCES
- Melrose C, Millett D. Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1998; 113(5):507-14.
- Knierim R. Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. The Angle Orthodontist. 1973;43(2): 218-20
- Zachrisson, BU: Long-term experience with bonded retainers: update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod. 41, 2007, 728–737.
- Zachrrison B U 1977 Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers .American Journal of Orthodontics 71: 440-448
- Zachrisson B U , Büyükyilmaz T Bonding in orthodontics . In: Graber L W (ed). Orthodontics: current principles and techniques,4th ed. Mosby , St Louis , 2005) pp. 621 – 659
- Zachrisson B. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:247-55.
- Edwards JG. A long-term prospective evaluation of the circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1988; 93:380-387.
- Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA, Tahir E. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthodpedics 1994; 106:243-249.
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. (4th ed.), Chapter 17, St Louis, Mosby Elsevier, 2007
- Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1993; 104:319-329.
- Kaplan H. The logic of modern retention procedures. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1988; 93:325-340.
- Joondelph DR, Riedel RA. Retention and Relapse. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, eds. Orthodontics Current Principles and Techniques. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby - Year Book, 1994:908-950.
- Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics for the student and general practitioner. 3rd ed. Chicago, London, Boca Raton: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1973.
- Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG, Sheridan JJ. Orthodontic retention and stability: a clinical perspective. J Clin Orthod. 2007;41(3):125–32.
- William R. Proffit, Henry W. Fields, and David M. Sarver. Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby 978-0323040464, 2006
- Sarver DM, Proffit WR. In TM Graber et al., eds., Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 4th ed., St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby, 2005.
- Sheridan J, LeDoux W, McMinn R. Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO1993;27(1):37- 45.
- McNamara JA, Brudon, WI. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1st edition, Needham Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2001.
- Owen 3rd A. 4-4 Crozat retainer. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO1985;19(3):194-7.
- Linden F. The Van der Linden Retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics2003;37(5):260-7.
- Kansal.S,Kumar.P,Singh.G. Kansal’s Retainer: A removable tooth borne orthodontic retainer. J Ind Orthod Soc ;2013 47(4):353-356.
- Fernandez Sanchez J, Pernia Ramirez I, Martin Alonso J. Osamu active retainer for correction of mild relapse. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 1998; 32:26-8.
- Bearn D. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics1995;108(2):207-13
Disclaimer from Guident
The views and opinions expressed in articles published in Guident are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors, the editorial board or the publisher, Ivory India. Guident does not endorse any product, technique or treatment described. Clinical content is intended for qualified dental and medical professionals and is not a substitute for individual clinical judgement. Guident, its editors and the publisher accept no liability for any consequence arising from the use of information published in the journal.
How to cite this article
Dr. Shyamala Naidu, Dr. Anand Suresh. Orthodontic Retainers. Guident. 2018 Oct;11(11). Available from: https://guident.in/articles/orthodontics/orthodontic-retainers.html


