Open AccessPeer ReviewedPublished Monthly Since 2007 Vol. 19, Issue 12 · November 2026Media Kitinfo@guident.net
Open AccessProsthodontics

Functional Rehabilitation of an Anterior Maxillary Defect

  • Dr. Aditya KapoorSpecialist Prosthodontics
  • Dr. Aditya ChaudharyConsultant
  • Dr. Abhishek BansalP.G Student

Dental Care Clinic, Palika Health Complex, N.D.M.C Delhi

Guident · Volume 8, Issue 6 (May 2015)Published May 20156 min read11 figures

ABSTRACT

Post Surgical defects have been effectively treated with obturators since a long time. Mostly such defects are present in the palatal region. A variety of problems are faced by the prosthodontist in attempting the reconstruction of maxillary defects. This article reviews developments in techniques of obturator prosthesis design for patients experiencing maxillary defects. The present case deals with an approach to rehabilitate a patient with an anterior maxillary defect. The use of such an obturator lead to increased comfort in mastication and speech for the patient.

Key Words: Maxillofacial rehabilitation, Orofacial structure, Cystic lesion, Halitosis, Phonetics.

INTRODUCTION

A variety of materials and techniques have been used for the construction of prosthetic replacement of the acquired surgical defects. Most defects usually affect variety of functions, including speech, deglutition, management of oral secretions, and mastication. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation helps not only to restore oral functions and cosmetics following surgery but also the psychological well being of the patient.1,2 Thus defects of the orofacial structures must be analyzed as to the specific cause and the consequent objectives of rehabilitation.

Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillectomy defects has been described as an alternative to surgical reconstruction to close the oral cavity. The primary goal of prosthetic rehabilitation is closure of the maxillectomy defect and separation of the oral cavity from the sino-nasal cavities.3 Creating facial prostheses to restore midfacial defects involves many challenges, including the achievement of proper retention and marginal fit. Because the quality of life of a patient with an unrehabilitated facial deformity is significantly compromised, facial prosthetic rehabilitation is often selected as the treatment of choice.4

CASE REPORT

A 36 year old male patient reported to the Palika Health Complex, Dharam Marg, New Delhi Municipal Council complaining of difficulty in chewing and deglutition and whistling in voice while speaking. The patient’s medical history revealed that he had undergone surgical resection for a cystic lesion in the left anterior maxilla about one year ago and had the problem since then. He also complained of partially masticated food going into the defect which was very difficult to take out and caused a lot of pain and halitosis.

On clinical examination an oval defect was seen measuring approximately 4 x 2 cm. Its lateral border extended 3 mm beyond maxillary frenum on the right side to mesial aspect of maxillary left incisor on the left side (Fig.1). There were signs of healthy mucosal tissue at the borders of the defect (Fig.2). The patient had not been advised for any obturator prosthesis post surgery.

It was planned to fabricate a maxillary obturator prosthesis which would have a dual function of acting as a barrier against food and liquid from entering the defect during mastication and deglutition as well as escape of air and better phonetics. This would be connected to a palatal plate with the assistance of clasps for better retention.

CLINICAL PROCEDURE

  1. An upper maxillary tray was selected, the extensions of which covered all the maxillary teeth and vestibule. The anterior tray extensions were extended with modeling wax from mesial aspect of left canine to mesial extension of right first molar.
  2. Two gauze rolls were placed onto the defect before taking the impression such that alginate should not enter the undercut of the defect.
  3. Alginate was mixed as per manufacturers recommendation and tray filled with material. This was carried into the patient’s mouth and impression was taken.
  4. The tray was carefully removed after setting and the impression was inspected for any defects (Fig.3 & Fig.4).
  5. The cast was poured in type Type III gypsum (Dental stone) and base was fabricated. The alginate was removed from the defect in the cast and it was filled with Type II gypsum (Dental Plaster) (Fig.5).
  6. Bilateral clasps were fabricated on the interdental spaces between second premolar and molar on the maxillary cast.
  7. After doing the wax-up, the prosthesis was conventionally cured with heat-cured polymerizing acrylic resin.
  8. The assembly was then deflaxed and was finished and polished (Fig.6 & Fig.7).
  9. This was tried in the patient’s mouth and necessary adjustments were made. The assembly fitted in such a way that the metal clasps did not hinder the occlusion bilaterally (Fig.8, Fig.9, Fig.10 & Fig.11).
Clinical figure Clinical figure

Fig.1 & Fig.2 – Defect in the anterior maxilla

Clinical figure Clinical figure

Fig.3 & Fig.4 – Alginate impression of the defect in anterior maxilla

Clinical figure Clinical figure Clinical figure
Fig.5 – Defect filled with Type II gypsum (Dental Plaster)

Fig.6 & Fig.7 – Final prosthesis finished & polished

Clinical figure Clinical figure

Fig.8 & Fig.9 – Final prosthesis in the mouth

Clinical figure Clinical figure

Fig.10 & Fig.11 – Before treatment & After treatment

DISCUSSION

Maxillary defects are created by surgical treatment of benign or malignant neoplasms, congenital malformation and by trauma. The size and location of the defects influence the degree of impairment and difficulty in prosthetic rehabilitation. The obturator prosthesis is used to restore masticatory function and improve speech, deglutition and cosmetics for maxillary defect patients. Neglecting timely prosthodontic cooperation may cause inappropriate facial contour which is almost impossible to reconstruct. In the absence of immediate covering of the defect, soft tissues remain unsupported and collapse dramatically and aesthetic and/or possible psychological problems may occur. There is also complaint of partially masticated food going into the defect which was very difficult to take out and causes a lot of pain and halitosis. This also causes negative influence on psychology. Defect of such a magnitude usually leave the patient with a psychological barrier due to speech and deglutition problems. The prosthesis helped the patient to improve on the above said difficulties. Speech is improved as well as exploration of the defect by the tongue is prevented. Despite its advantages, however, prostheses has its own drawbacks, including the need for manual dexterity to maintain the prosthetic, the difficulty of obtaining perfecily leak-tight separation of the oral cavity from the nasal cavity and sinuses, the problem .depending on the amount of tissue resected-with long-term retention, constant irritation, and, of greatest importance, decreased patient satisfaction.5

CONCLUSION

Fabrication of prostheses does not require any special ability. To fabricate a prostheses, extension into a defect or an arbitrary extension of a prosthesis into a defect is required. Fabrication of the maxillofacial prosthesis depends on the application of basic prosthodontic principles that are used in the treatment of patients without maxillary defects. Some principles must be modified because of the defect, the character and position of the remaining structures. The defect, in conjunction with the remaining structures, must be used to provide support, retention, and stability of a prosthesis. Acceptable prosthodontic care for the patient with the acquired maxillary defect should include cautious prosthesis design combined with routine maintenance care to provide comfort, function, cosmetics, and minimal change to the compromised remaining structures.6,7

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Chhuchhar L., Gandhewar M.A. Guide Flange Prosthesis for Management for a Hemimandibulectomy Patient- A Clinical Case. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 8(6):23-25.
  2. Patil PG, and Patil SP. A hollow definitive obturator fabrication technique for management of partial maxillectomy. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 Nov;4(4):248-53.
  3. Okay DJ, Buchbinder D, and Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: A classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:352-63.
  4. Oki M, Ozawa S, and Taniguchi H. A maxillary lip prosthesis retained by an obturator with attachments : A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:135-8.
  5. Shrime MG, and Gilbert RW. Reconstruction of the midface and maxilla. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 2009;17:211-223.
  6. Desjardins Obturator prosthesis design for acquired maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39(4):424–435.
  7. McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, Ahlstrom RH, Smith CR, Koumjian JH, and Arbree NS. Classification system for partial edentulism. J Prosthodont 2002;11:181-93.

More references are available on request.

Disclaimer from Guident

The views and opinions expressed in articles published in Guident are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors, the editorial board or the publisher, Ivory India. Guident does not endorse any product, technique or treatment described. Clinical content is intended for qualified dental and medical professionals and is not a substitute for individual clinical judgement. Guident, its editors and the publisher accept no liability for any consequence arising from the use of information published in the journal.

How to cite this article

Dr. Aditya Kapoor, Dr. Aditya Chaudhary, Dr. Abhishek Bansal. Functional Rehabilitation of an Anterior Maxillary Defect. Guident. 2015 May;8(6). Available from: https://guident.in/articles/prosthodontics/functional-rehabilitation-of-an-anterior-maxillary-defect.html

Related articles

More in Prosthodontics

All 386 articles
Vol. 8, Issue 6 · May 2015

Practical Approach to Splint Therapy

An occlusal splint has multiple functions and can be used for various therapeutic causes. It has many advantages and limitations as well. An oral appliance is dependent largely on the…

Dr. Krishna Prasad D.

Vol. 8, Issue 5 · April 2015

Shortened Dental Arch

The functional demands of patients are highly variable and individual, requiring dental treatment to be tailored to the individual’s needs and adaptive capability. The world health…

Dr. Anjali bhoyar

Call for papers

Publish your clinical work in Guident

Original research, case reports and review articles are welcomed from clinicians and researchers worldwide. Every submission is assessed by the editorial board.