Open AccessPeer ReviewedPublished Monthly Since 2007 Vol. 19, Issue 12 · November 2026Media Kitinfo@guident.net
Open AccessCase ReportProsthodontics

Access to Better Dentures

  • Dr. Rubina tabassumProfessor
  • Dr. Shetty omkarDean & H.O.D
  • Dr. Furia Vinit Chandrakant Department of ProsthodonticsP.G Student
  • Dr. D.Y .Patil Dental College And Hospital

Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India

Guident · Volume 9, Issue 3 (February 2016)Published February 20166 min read3 figures

ABSTRACT

Preservation of alveolar bone is the main aim of conventional tooth-retained overdenture. Preservation of teeth for overdenture can improve retention and stability. In this case report, partial edentulous patient was treated with a tooth supported overdenture using Access Post System. The final prosthesis was, well retained, stable and aesthetic, serving as a conservative approach to root preservation.

Keywords: Access Post System; Overdenture; Retention; Stability.

INTRODUCTION

Complete edentulism can substantially affect oral and general health as well as overall quality of life.1-3Patient satis¬faction with dentures is influenced by various factors including denture quality, the available denture bearing area, the qual¬ity of dentist–patient interaction, previous experience with dentures, patient’s personality and psychologic well-being.4,5Replacing the lost tissues by means of complete dentures is challenging both for the dentist and the patient.6Never¬theless, some people do not succeed in acquiring new skills with their dentures and thus suffer psychologically because of impaired function, comfort, self-image and social interac¬tion.

Mandibular complete overdenture treatment is an effective and versatile means of restoring missing teeth and improving facial contours and is increasingly gaining popularity. As dentistry is experiencing a paradigm shift, in which mandibular im¬plant overdenture treatment may become the new standard of care for the treatment of the edentulous mandible.Dentist are looking for simplified treatments which are cost-effective alternatives to more complex and expensive implant-prostho¬dontic procedures.7 Maintenance of the residual alveolar bone is the most significant advantage of a tooth borne overdenture as the bone volume and vertical height can help in in¬creased prosthetic retention and stability.It also gives patient better function and control because of intact proprioception.7

The shortened crown improves the crown-to-root ratio, there¬by decreasing the mobility of the abutment teeth under an overdenture.In a 4-year-study, Renner and his co-workers8 showed that 50% of roots, used as overdenture abutments remained immobile. In addition, 25% of roots that were initially mobile became less mobile.The use of attachments can re-direct occlusal forces away from weak supporting abutments and onto soft tissue.They act as shock ab-sorbers as well as providessuperior re-tention.Attachments are often used in overdenture. This article reports a conservative approach of root preservation followed by replacement of missing teeth using Access post attachment with mandibular overdenture.8

CASE REPORT

A 40 years old female patientreported to the department of Prosthodontics at Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College and Hospital with the chief complaint of all the teeth missing in the upper arch and few remaining natural teeth in the lower arch along withdifficulty in chewing.

Clin¬ical examination revealed completely edentulous maxillary arch and partially edentulous mandibular arch. Periodontal findings were significant with moderate amount of calculus and stains present along with gingival recession but no pock¬et formation. Teeth present in lower arch were 33 and 43. Loss of teeth had occurred due to decay, mobility and lack of oral hygiene practice in ear¬lier life. (FIG.1)

As remaining teeth were periodontally compromised, removable partial denture would not restore function and aesthetics to optimum function. It was concluded that mandibular canines could serve as abut¬ments for an overdenture thus providing required retention and stability. Diagnostic mounting revealed adequate inter¬arch distance for necessary overdenture components and esthetic and functional placement of artificial acrylic teeth.

Treatment plan was di¬vided into two phases: Phase 1:Preprosthetic phase, Phase 2: Prosthetic phase.

1. Preprosthetic phase: Endodontic treatment of 33,43 and oral prophylaxis management of them was done.

2. Prosthetic phase: The mandibular canines were pre¬pared followed by primary impression made in irreversible hydrocolloid (Imprint,DPI). Final impression was made in a special tray after bor¬der molding with low fusing compound(Greenstick,DPI) and wash impression with zinc oxide eugenol impression paste (DPI). Master cast was obtained. Orientation relation was recorded and transferred on a semiadjustable articulator. Lower cast was mounted using centric relation record.

Fol¬lowing teeth arrangement try-in was done, vertical dimension verified and centric and eccentric contacts were evaluated. Facial and functional harmony was studied and patient’s ap¬proval was obtained. Final dentureprocessing was done. After lab remounting and selective grind¬ing, the final dentures were finished and polished.

Post space preparation was carried out and Access Post was then cemented using zinc phosphate cement. The female cap was then attached chair-side to the denture using auto polymerizing acrylic resin (FIG.2). For this pur¬pose, rubber bands were used to cover the height of contour of the head and the nylon cap was placed on the ball of the post. Once the nylon cap was picked up, rubber bands were removed and flash trimmed. The denture was ad¬justed and equilibrated (FIG.3).

Post insertion instructions were given along with recall appointment. The following day mouth wasinspected for any sore areas and final corrections were made. The designed prosthesis served as an aesthetic and functional solution in the management of this patient.

Clinical figure Clinical figure
Fig.1: Pre-Operative Intra-Oral View Fig. 2 : Access Post In Place With The Rubber And Nylon Caps
Clinical figure
Fig. 3: Post-Operavtive Intra-Oral View

DISCUSSION

Overdenture treatment is a notion which precludes the preventability of “floating plastic” in edentulous mouth. It is a sensible and prudent approach by the prosthodontist that has mitigated much of the time dependent risk inherent in complete denture service. Retention and Stability are enhanced, residual ridge resorption retarded and patient mediated responses are much improved.The overdenture merits are many, the pa¬tients chewing efficiency is one-third higher than that of complete denture wearers.The use of teeth as overdenture abutments is beneficial to patients especially from the psycho¬logical aspect of patients losing teeth which cannot be underestimated and this has been well documented.Even after knowing the merits,Tooth-borne overdenture attachment therapy is a treatment option rare¬ly chosen in today’s aggressive marketing of implant treat¬ment.8,9

The success of the overdenture treatment depends upon the proper attachment selection for a particular case. Attachment selection is based on available buccolingual and inter arch space, amount of bone support, opposing denti¬tion, clinical experience, personal preferences, maintenance problems and cost.9,10

Access posts are stud attachments that work well with overdentures, as they are the simplest of all. They occupy a small vertical space and the male units on the different roots do not require parallelism. The ball and sock¬et attachment of Access post allows rotation of the denture attachment. Small head of the attachment limits the amount of material that has to be removed from the denture.The ny¬lon cap provides 3-5 pounds of retention.10Thus this concept is cost effective.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion to obtain successful overdenture rehabilitation the dentists must be careful during case selection and abut¬ment preparation and a proper periodic follow-up.

REFERENCES

  1. Marcus PA, Joshi A, Jones JA, Morgano SM. Complete eden¬tulism and denture use for elders in New England. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.1996;76(3):260-6.
  2. Gift H, Redford M. Oral health and the quality of life. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 1992;8(3):673.
  3. Baran İ, Ergün G, Semiz M. Socio-demographic and econom¬ic factors affecting the acceptance of removable dentures. Eu¬ropean journal of dentistry. 2007;1(2):104.
  4. Boerrigter E, Geertman M, Van Oort R, Bouma J, Raghoebar G, Van Waas M, et al. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants—a multicentre random¬ized clinical trial. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Sur¬gery. 1995;33(5):282-8.
  5. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5‐year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. Jour¬nal of oral rehabilitation. 1999;26(3):195-202.
  6. Zarb GA. Oral motor patterns and their relation to oral pros¬theses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1982;47(5):472.
  7. Burns DR. The mandibular complete overdenture.Dental Clinics of North America. 2004;48(3):603.
  8. Renner R, Gomes B, Shakun M, Baer P, Davis R, Camp P. Four-year longitudinal study of the periodontal health status of overdenture patients. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984;51(5):593-8.
  9. Preiskel HW. Overdentures Made Easy- A guide to implant and root supported prosthesis. 2nd ed.
  10. Catalogue of Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd.

Disclaimer from Guident

The views and opinions expressed in articles published in Guident are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors, the editorial board or the publisher, Ivory India. Guident does not endorse any product, technique or treatment described. Clinical content is intended for qualified dental and medical professionals and is not a substitute for individual clinical judgement. Guident, its editors and the publisher accept no liability for any consequence arising from the use of information published in the journal.

How to cite this article

Dr. Rubina tabassum, Dr. Shetty omkar, Dr. Furia Vinit Chandrakant Department of Prosthodontics, Dr. D.Y .Patil Dental College And Hospital. Access to Better Dentures. Guident. 2016 Feb;9(3). Available from: https://guident.in/articles/prosthodontics/access-to-better-dentures.html

Related articles

More in Prosthodontics

All 386 articles
Vol. 9, Issue 3 · February 2016

Acupuncture in Prosthodontics

Authors : Dr Rohit Raghavan , Dr Shreshta Sathish . Abstract Acupuncture has been accepted to effectively treat chronic pain by inserting needles into the specific ‘‘acupuncture points’’…

Dr Rohit Raghavan

Call for papers

Publish your clinical work in Guident

Original research, case reports and review articles are welcomed from clinicians and researchers worldwide. Every submission is assessed by the editorial board.